BLOG
products
Solutions
Resources
Canada's employment landscape is shifting faster than our systems can adapt. With unemployment hovering around 7% while skill shortages persist across key sectors, we're facing a fundamental mismatch that traditional approaches aren't solving. Meanwhile, countries like Denmark, Singapore, and Ireland are demonstrating what's possible when employment services evolve to meet modern realities.
The opportunity is clear: nations that modernize their workforce systems first will capture the competitive advantage in attracting talent and investment. Canada has all the ingredients to lead this transformation.
Skills gaps are the primary barrier to business growth globally, affecting 63% of employers according to recent World Economic Forum research. While this challenge is universal, responses vary dramatically. Denmark leads UN digital government rankings, pairing modernization with active labour market and skilling policies that accelerate re-employment. Singapore has gone further, deploying AI-powered job matching and workforce transition tools that directly connect individuals to sustainable careers. Estonia, often cited for its pioneering digital infrastructure, uses the same foundation not just to attract global talent (e.g., through digital nomad visas) but also to integrate lifelong learning and reskilling services into its e-governance systems—reducing friction for both residents and international workers in navigating new opportunities.
These aren't accidents. They're strategic choices by governments committed to building systems that create value in addition to managing process.
Our federal-provincial structure creates ideal conditions for experimentation and scaling. We have an educated workforce, a strong technology sector, and diverse regional economies that span everything from Atlantic fisheries to Prairie agriculture to BC tech innovation. Multiple provinces are already investing significantly in workforce system modernization.
The question, then, is how Canada can turn these advantages into a coherent strategy. Other countries have shown that modernization doesn’t happen by accident, it happens through deliberate choices and system-wide shifts. Canada doesn’t need to copy models wholesale, but we do need to learn from what works abroad and adapt it to our unique federal-provincial context.
The following ten strategic shifts outline how Canada can move from fragmented efforts to a coordinated, future-ready employment system, one that measures long-term outcomes, puts jobseekers at the centre, and mobilizes technology and data as shared infrastructure.
The current approach: Most employment services track immediate outputs like training completions, job placements, and workshop attendance. The reliance on these metrics stems from the fact that they are simple to measure within existing systems and reporting structures. However, this focus creates perverse incentives: providers are rewarded for quick, surface-level outcomes rather than investing in the infrastructure, data systems, and supports needed to track and enable sustainable career development.
The strategic shift: Track longitudinal outcomes that reflect actual value creation - wage progression over a period of time, career advancement indicators, retention in quality employment, and skills development that translates into measurable advancement.
Example: Ireland uses linked administrative data to follow employment programme participants over multiple years. By linking welfare, tax, and training records, policymakers can assess whether programmes lead to sustained employment and earnings growth or only short-term job placements. This evidence has been used to inform funding and policy decisions, showing that initiatives with similar immediate placement rates can diverge sharply in their long-term career impacts.
The current approach: Employment services across Canada remain fragmented, shaped by the way programs are funded and governed. Within provinces, ministries often oversee employment, training, and social supports separately, while community-based providers operate under program-specific contracts. Privacy legislation and outdated IT infrastructure add further barriers to integration. The result is a patchwork of siloed systems where jobseekers must navigate multiple portals, repeat the same information, and stitch together services on their own.
The strategic shift: Create systems where a person's story, goals, and progress travel with them across providers. Standardize intake processes and enable secure data sharing so people can focus on moving forward rather than repeatedly explaining their situation.
Example: Estonia’s X‑Road digital infrastructure enables secure data exchange among over 900 institutions and enterprises, alongside hundreds of public sector organizations, and supports nearly 1,900 integrated IT systems. It follows the “once-only” principle - citizens provide data once, and it is reused across government and private services with robust privacy safeguards. The platform processes around 2 billion transactions annually, and current estimates suggest it saves the equivalent of 1,345 work-years per year in eliminated repetitive tasks and administrative burden
The current approach: Many employment systems are still designed around administrative compliance rather than the lived realities of jobseekers. This is partly a product of legislation and funding rules that prioritize documentation and eligibility checks over usability, and partly a result of program design that assumes what works on paper will translate smoothly into practice. The outcome is complex forms, rigid processes, and jargon-heavy communications that place the burden on individuals already experiencing the stress and demotivation of unemployment. Instead of support, jobseekers encounter barriers that cause many to give up partway through or end up in programs misaligned with their skills and goals.
The strategic shift: Adopt human-centered design principles, with plain-language policies, intuitive digital interfaces, and transparent decisions that build trust. Tech-enabled simplification: using automation to strip out redundant paperwork, surfacing the right opportunities to the right person at the right time, and ensuring accessible appeals with meaningful human oversight for all high-stakes decisions.
Example: Australia retired its legacy Jobactive programme after widespread complaints that it was confusing, compliance-heavy, and paper-based. In 2022 it launched Workforce Australia, a digital-first employment services platform that integrates job search, training, and provider support in one place. The redesign focused on reducing administrative burden, simplifying rules, and giving jobseekers clearer, faster digital pathways while still providing human support for those who need it
The current approach: Employment services are still largely built on the assumption that people will come to them. Offices with fixed hours, complex paperwork, and rigid scheduling reflect administrative and compliance requirements that make in-person delivery the default. While this approach ensures certain standards are met, it effectively shuts out those with jobs, caregiving duties, limited mobility, or who live in remote areas. At the same time, the current model assumes a single mode of access, overlooking the fact that not everyone can, or wants to, engage through a digital front door. People with limited digital literacy, for example, need to be supported in ways that match their circumstances.
The strategic shift: Flip the model. Build a digital front door as the first stop for everyone - a single entry point where jobseekers can start their journey at any time of day. From there, people are streamed into the right level of support: simple digital tools for those who just need quick information, virtual coaching for those who need guidance, and face-to-face services for those with more complex barriers. The test of success isn’t how many offices exist, but how easily someone can get the right help in the right way.
Example: Singapore has moved to a digital-first entry point for jobseekers via the MyCareersFuture portal, where people can begin their job search and access career-building tools. For those seeking more support, services extend beyond fixed offices: Careers Connect On‑The‑Go brings advisors into malls and community venues, and Careers Connect Centres offer personalized in-person coaching and workshops. This blended model isn’t about more physical locations - it’s about meeting jobseekers where they are and in ways that fit their lives. It also delivers results: 70% of jobseekers who received customized career coaching secured employment through these services.
The current approach: Employment services wait for people to become unemployed before offering help. By then, someone has lost their income, confidence has dropped, and they're competing with everyone else looking for work. The system is purely reactive - people must hit rock bottom before accessing support that could have prevented the crisis entirely.
The strategic shift: Use early-warning signals (firm/sector transformation plans, local demand data, and workforce agreements) to spot roles at risk months in advance, then retrain people while they’re still employed. This reframes employment services from an unemployment safety net to a career-stability platform.
Example: Germany introduced a national wage-replacement benefit that companies can access before layoffs when structural change (e.g., automation, green transition) means a significant share of staff needs upskilling. Employees remain on contract; during approved training, they receive 60% of net pay as a benefit administered by the Federal Employment Agency, and employers may top up.
The current approach: Employment services often face a false choice between “high-tech” and “high-touch.” Traditional systems rely heavily on overstretched caseworkers, while newer efforts sometimes overcorrect with AI attempting to replace counselors entirely. Neither extreme builds trust or effectiveness.
The strategic shift: Use AI to take on repetitive, low-value tasks, such as document checks, labour market data lookups, and first-pass screening, so counselors can spend more time on what matters: coaching, motivation, and problem-solving. But any decision affecting benefits or long-term career trajectory must include human oversight, with clear escalation and appeal. The goal is not to sideline caseworkers, but to make them more impactful.
Example: In the healthcare sector, Omega Healthcare Management Services, supporting over 350 provider, payer, and pharmaceutical clients, partnered with UiPath to automate document-heavy tasks such as medical billing, claim processing, and correspondence. Using UiPath’s AI‑powered Document Understanding tool, they have since processed over 100 million transactions, saving more than 15,000 employee-hours per month, reducing documentation time by 40%, cutting turnaround by 50%, achieving 99.5% accuracy, and delivering a 30% ROI to clients. Crucially, while AI handles repetitive extraction, human reviewers remain central to decision-making, enabling staff to transition toward higher-value, judgment-driven work
The current approach: Jobseekers are often presented with endless menus of training courses and programs, with little clarity on which ones actually pay off. Providers push options based on open slots rather than proven impact. The result is “training theater”, where people cycle through activities that check boxes but don’t build real careers.
The strategic shift: Respect participants’ time by curating pathways based on outcomes, not availability. That means showing which options actually lead to wage growth, career advancement, and sustained employment. Funders and policymakers should double down on what works and actively improve or phase out what doesn’t, creating a culture of continuous learning system-wide.
Example: Singapore’s Workforce Skills Qualifications (WSQ) system illustrates how quality can be embedded into a national training framework. All training providers must comply with the Training Provider Quality Assurance (TPQA) framework, which enforces rigorous standards on course relevance, instructional quality, and outcome tracking. Programs that do not meet benchmarks on employment and wage outcomes are subject to review or defunding, while those that demonstrate measurable impact are scaled up. Evaluations show clear results: trainees who complete a WSQ qualification see an average 5.8% real wage premium, while previously unemployed participants are significantly more likely to find work the following year.
The current approach: Workforce development organizations often struggle to effectively engage employers beyond surface-level interactions, while employers may express interest in partnership without fully committing the time and resources to build a meaningful relationship. The result is a transactional model that centers on job postings and résumé forwarding, missing the chance to align training, hiring, and long-term workforce planning.
The strategic shift: Treat major employers as workforce development partners with dedicated account management. Understand their growth plans, co-design training programs, and create talent pipelines before vacancies emerge.
Example: In the United Kingdom, the Department for Work and Pensions’ Sector-based Work Academy Programme (SWAP) partners with employers to run demand-led academies, up to six weeks of sector-specific pre-employment training, a short work placement and a guaranteed interview, so firms hire job-ready candidates for defined roles rather than sift generic résumés.
The current approach: Employment systems change in big, infrequent waves. Program evaluations happen annually at best, long after participants have moved on. Innovation gets siloed in pilot projects that rarely scale.
The strategic shift: Make continuous improvement the default. Build quarterly feedback loops, embed rapid-cycle testing, and treat every program as a living system that adapts in real time. That means running A/B tests on outreach messages, piloting new workshop formats for eight weeks, and scaling only those interventions that deliver measurable results. Small, iterative changes compound into major performance gains when they become system habits.
Example: Outside of employment services, the UK’s Behavioural Insights Team (BIT) shows how continuous learning can transform government practice. BIT institutionalized rapid-cycle experiments, running A/B tests on policies ranging from tax collection to job recruitment. One trial changed a single line in tax reminder letters, increasing timely payments by 15 percentage points, a result so strong it was scaled nationwide within weeks. The model has since spread globally, with behavioural insights units now embedded in other governments, proving that “test–learn–scale” can become routine.
The current approach: Labour market information in Canada is fragmented. Provinces, federal departments, training providers, and private platforms all collect data, but it sits in silos. Jobseekers don’t know which programs lead to good careers, employers struggle to signal demand, and policymakers operate with a lagging picture of skills gaps. Data is treated as an administrative by-product, not as shared infrastructure for innovation.
The strategic shift: Build a national, interoperable system that integrates education, training, wage, and employment outcomes, and make it openly available (with privacy safeguards) to governments, employers, researchers, and innovators. Just as healthcare and climate data inform entire ecosystems of decisions, workforce data should serve as core national infrastructure that underpins not only employment services but also education planning, immigration pathways, and economic development strategies.
Example: A powerful parallel comes from transportation. When Transport for London (TfL) opened its transit data, like bus arrivals, train schedules, disruptions, it sparked an ecosystem of innovation. Apps like Citymapper and Google Maps transit features flourished, businesses optimized delivery routes, and riders gained real-time visibility. Independent analysis estimates this open data now generates over £130 million annually in economic benefits through efficiency and innovation. The key lesson: when governments treat data as shared infrastructure, whole systems get smarter.
Canada’s workforce system is at a crossroads. We can keep patching together programs that lag behind economic change, or we can reimagine employment services as strategic infrastructure for competitiveness.
The ten shifts outlined here are not tweaks; they are a blueprint for a system that measures real outcomes, puts people at the centre, and makes technology an enabler rather than a replacement. Done right, this is the difference between a safety net that catches people after they fall and a launchpad that prepares Canadians to thrive through disruption.
.png)
Canada's employment landscape is shifting faster than our systems can adapt. With unemployment hovering around 7% while skill shortages persist across key sectors, we're facing a fundamental mismatch that traditional approaches aren't solving. Meanwhile, countries like Denmark, Singapore, and Ireland are demonstrating what's possible when employment services evolve to meet modern realities.
The opportunity is clear: nations that modernize their workforce systems first will capture the competitive advantage in attracting talent and investment. Canada has all the ingredients to lead this transformation.
Skills gaps are the primary barrier to business growth globally, affecting 63% of employers according to recent World Economic Forum research. While this challenge is universal, responses vary dramatically. Denmark leads UN digital government rankings, pairing modernization with active labour market and skilling policies that accelerate re-employment. Singapore has gone further, deploying AI-powered job matching and workforce transition tools that directly connect individuals to sustainable careers. Estonia, often cited for its pioneering digital infrastructure, uses the same foundation not just to attract global talent (e.g., through digital nomad visas) but also to integrate lifelong learning and reskilling services into its e-governance systems—reducing friction for both residents and international workers in navigating new opportunities.
These aren't accidents. They're strategic choices by governments committed to building systems that create value in addition to managing process.
Our federal-provincial structure creates ideal conditions for experimentation and scaling. We have an educated workforce, a strong technology sector, and diverse regional economies that span everything from Atlantic fisheries to Prairie agriculture to BC tech innovation. Multiple provinces are already investing significantly in workforce system modernization.
The question, then, is how Canada can turn these advantages into a coherent strategy. Other countries have shown that modernization doesn’t happen by accident, it happens through deliberate choices and system-wide shifts. Canada doesn’t need to copy models wholesale, but we do need to learn from what works abroad and adapt it to our unique federal-provincial context.
The following ten strategic shifts outline how Canada can move from fragmented efforts to a coordinated, future-ready employment system, one that measures long-term outcomes, puts jobseekers at the centre, and mobilizes technology and data as shared infrastructure.
The current approach: Most employment services track immediate outputs like training completions, job placements, and workshop attendance. The reliance on these metrics stems from the fact that they are simple to measure within existing systems and reporting structures. However, this focus creates perverse incentives: providers are rewarded for quick, surface-level outcomes rather than investing in the infrastructure, data systems, and supports needed to track and enable sustainable career development.
The strategic shift: Track longitudinal outcomes that reflect actual value creation - wage progression over a period of time, career advancement indicators, retention in quality employment, and skills development that translates into measurable advancement.
Example: Ireland uses linked administrative data to follow employment programme participants over multiple years. By linking welfare, tax, and training records, policymakers can assess whether programmes lead to sustained employment and earnings growth or only short-term job placements. This evidence has been used to inform funding and policy decisions, showing that initiatives with similar immediate placement rates can diverge sharply in their long-term career impacts.
The current approach: Employment services across Canada remain fragmented, shaped by the way programs are funded and governed. Within provinces, ministries often oversee employment, training, and social supports separately, while community-based providers operate under program-specific contracts. Privacy legislation and outdated IT infrastructure add further barriers to integration. The result is a patchwork of siloed systems where jobseekers must navigate multiple portals, repeat the same information, and stitch together services on their own.
The strategic shift: Create systems where a person's story, goals, and progress travel with them across providers. Standardize intake processes and enable secure data sharing so people can focus on moving forward rather than repeatedly explaining their situation.
Example: Estonia’s X‑Road digital infrastructure enables secure data exchange among over 900 institutions and enterprises, alongside hundreds of public sector organizations, and supports nearly 1,900 integrated IT systems. It follows the “once-only” principle - citizens provide data once, and it is reused across government and private services with robust privacy safeguards. The platform processes around 2 billion transactions annually, and current estimates suggest it saves the equivalent of 1,345 work-years per year in eliminated repetitive tasks and administrative burden
The current approach: Many employment systems are still designed around administrative compliance rather than the lived realities of jobseekers. This is partly a product of legislation and funding rules that prioritize documentation and eligibility checks over usability, and partly a result of program design that assumes what works on paper will translate smoothly into practice. The outcome is complex forms, rigid processes, and jargon-heavy communications that place the burden on individuals already experiencing the stress and demotivation of unemployment. Instead of support, jobseekers encounter barriers that cause many to give up partway through or end up in programs misaligned with their skills and goals.
The strategic shift: Adopt human-centered design principles, with plain-language policies, intuitive digital interfaces, and transparent decisions that build trust. Tech-enabled simplification: using automation to strip out redundant paperwork, surfacing the right opportunities to the right person at the right time, and ensuring accessible appeals with meaningful human oversight for all high-stakes decisions.
Example: Australia retired its legacy Jobactive programme after widespread complaints that it was confusing, compliance-heavy, and paper-based. In 2022 it launched Workforce Australia, a digital-first employment services platform that integrates job search, training, and provider support in one place. The redesign focused on reducing administrative burden, simplifying rules, and giving jobseekers clearer, faster digital pathways while still providing human support for those who need it
The current approach: Employment services are still largely built on the assumption that people will come to them. Offices with fixed hours, complex paperwork, and rigid scheduling reflect administrative and compliance requirements that make in-person delivery the default. While this approach ensures certain standards are met, it effectively shuts out those with jobs, caregiving duties, limited mobility, or who live in remote areas. At the same time, the current model assumes a single mode of access, overlooking the fact that not everyone can, or wants to, engage through a digital front door. People with limited digital literacy, for example, need to be supported in ways that match their circumstances.
The strategic shift: Flip the model. Build a digital front door as the first stop for everyone - a single entry point where jobseekers can start their journey at any time of day. From there, people are streamed into the right level of support: simple digital tools for those who just need quick information, virtual coaching for those who need guidance, and face-to-face services for those with more complex barriers. The test of success isn’t how many offices exist, but how easily someone can get the right help in the right way.
Example: Singapore has moved to a digital-first entry point for jobseekers via the MyCareersFuture portal, where people can begin their job search and access career-building tools. For those seeking more support, services extend beyond fixed offices: Careers Connect On‑The‑Go brings advisors into malls and community venues, and Careers Connect Centres offer personalized in-person coaching and workshops. This blended model isn’t about more physical locations - it’s about meeting jobseekers where they are and in ways that fit their lives. It also delivers results: 70% of jobseekers who received customized career coaching secured employment through these services.
The current approach: Employment services wait for people to become unemployed before offering help. By then, someone has lost their income, confidence has dropped, and they're competing with everyone else looking for work. The system is purely reactive - people must hit rock bottom before accessing support that could have prevented the crisis entirely.
The strategic shift: Use early-warning signals (firm/sector transformation plans, local demand data, and workforce agreements) to spot roles at risk months in advance, then retrain people while they’re still employed. This reframes employment services from an unemployment safety net to a career-stability platform.
Example: Germany introduced a national wage-replacement benefit that companies can access before layoffs when structural change (e.g., automation, green transition) means a significant share of staff needs upskilling. Employees remain on contract; during approved training, they receive 60% of net pay as a benefit administered by the Federal Employment Agency, and employers may top up.
The current approach: Employment services often face a false choice between “high-tech” and “high-touch.” Traditional systems rely heavily on overstretched caseworkers, while newer efforts sometimes overcorrect with AI attempting to replace counselors entirely. Neither extreme builds trust or effectiveness.
The strategic shift: Use AI to take on repetitive, low-value tasks, such as document checks, labour market data lookups, and first-pass screening, so counselors can spend more time on what matters: coaching, motivation, and problem-solving. But any decision affecting benefits or long-term career trajectory must include human oversight, with clear escalation and appeal. The goal is not to sideline caseworkers, but to make them more impactful.
Example: In the healthcare sector, Omega Healthcare Management Services, supporting over 350 provider, payer, and pharmaceutical clients, partnered with UiPath to automate document-heavy tasks such as medical billing, claim processing, and correspondence. Using UiPath’s AI‑powered Document Understanding tool, they have since processed over 100 million transactions, saving more than 15,000 employee-hours per month, reducing documentation time by 40%, cutting turnaround by 50%, achieving 99.5% accuracy, and delivering a 30% ROI to clients. Crucially, while AI handles repetitive extraction, human reviewers remain central to decision-making, enabling staff to transition toward higher-value, judgment-driven work
The current approach: Jobseekers are often presented with endless menus of training courses and programs, with little clarity on which ones actually pay off. Providers push options based on open slots rather than proven impact. The result is “training theater”, where people cycle through activities that check boxes but don’t build real careers.
The strategic shift: Respect participants’ time by curating pathways based on outcomes, not availability. That means showing which options actually lead to wage growth, career advancement, and sustained employment. Funders and policymakers should double down on what works and actively improve or phase out what doesn’t, creating a culture of continuous learning system-wide.
Example: Singapore’s Workforce Skills Qualifications (WSQ) system illustrates how quality can be embedded into a national training framework. All training providers must comply with the Training Provider Quality Assurance (TPQA) framework, which enforces rigorous standards on course relevance, instructional quality, and outcome tracking. Programs that do not meet benchmarks on employment and wage outcomes are subject to review or defunding, while those that demonstrate measurable impact are scaled up. Evaluations show clear results: trainees who complete a WSQ qualification see an average 5.8% real wage premium, while previously unemployed participants are significantly more likely to find work the following year.
The current approach: Workforce development organizations often struggle to effectively engage employers beyond surface-level interactions, while employers may express interest in partnership without fully committing the time and resources to build a meaningful relationship. The result is a transactional model that centers on job postings and résumé forwarding, missing the chance to align training, hiring, and long-term workforce planning.
The strategic shift: Treat major employers as workforce development partners with dedicated account management. Understand their growth plans, co-design training programs, and create talent pipelines before vacancies emerge.
Example: In the United Kingdom, the Department for Work and Pensions’ Sector-based Work Academy Programme (SWAP) partners with employers to run demand-led academies, up to six weeks of sector-specific pre-employment training, a short work placement and a guaranteed interview, so firms hire job-ready candidates for defined roles rather than sift generic résumés.
The current approach: Employment systems change in big, infrequent waves. Program evaluations happen annually at best, long after participants have moved on. Innovation gets siloed in pilot projects that rarely scale.
The strategic shift: Make continuous improvement the default. Build quarterly feedback loops, embed rapid-cycle testing, and treat every program as a living system that adapts in real time. That means running A/B tests on outreach messages, piloting new workshop formats for eight weeks, and scaling only those interventions that deliver measurable results. Small, iterative changes compound into major performance gains when they become system habits.
Example: Outside of employment services, the UK’s Behavioural Insights Team (BIT) shows how continuous learning can transform government practice. BIT institutionalized rapid-cycle experiments, running A/B tests on policies ranging from tax collection to job recruitment. One trial changed a single line in tax reminder letters, increasing timely payments by 15 percentage points, a result so strong it was scaled nationwide within weeks. The model has since spread globally, with behavioural insights units now embedded in other governments, proving that “test–learn–scale” can become routine.
The current approach: Labour market information in Canada is fragmented. Provinces, federal departments, training providers, and private platforms all collect data, but it sits in silos. Jobseekers don’t know which programs lead to good careers, employers struggle to signal demand, and policymakers operate with a lagging picture of skills gaps. Data is treated as an administrative by-product, not as shared infrastructure for innovation.
The strategic shift: Build a national, interoperable system that integrates education, training, wage, and employment outcomes, and make it openly available (with privacy safeguards) to governments, employers, researchers, and innovators. Just as healthcare and climate data inform entire ecosystems of decisions, workforce data should serve as core national infrastructure that underpins not only employment services but also education planning, immigration pathways, and economic development strategies.
Example: A powerful parallel comes from transportation. When Transport for London (TfL) opened its transit data, like bus arrivals, train schedules, disruptions, it sparked an ecosystem of innovation. Apps like Citymapper and Google Maps transit features flourished, businesses optimized delivery routes, and riders gained real-time visibility. Independent analysis estimates this open data now generates over £130 million annually in economic benefits through efficiency and innovation. The key lesson: when governments treat data as shared infrastructure, whole systems get smarter.
Canada’s workforce system is at a crossroads. We can keep patching together programs that lag behind economic change, or we can reimagine employment services as strategic infrastructure for competitiveness.
The ten shifts outlined here are not tweaks; they are a blueprint for a system that measures real outcomes, puts people at the centre, and makes technology an enabler rather than a replacement. Done right, this is the difference between a safety net that catches people after they fall and a launchpad that prepares Canadians to thrive through disruption.
.png)
.avif)
