BLOG
products
Solutions
Resources
While most workforce development coverage in 2025 focused on the billions committed in federal and provincial budgets, and the numbers are indeed historic, the more significant story is hiding in plain sight: Canada is fundamentally rewiring who leads workforce development.
For decades, the model was straightforward: governments fund training programs, education institutions design curricula based on their expertise, and employers hire from whoever graduates. When skills gaps appeared, the solution was more funding, more programs, more seats. Supply-side economics applied to talent.
That model is being quietly dismantled. In its place, a new approach is emerging, one where employers don't just consume talent, they co-design the pipelines that produce it.
The clearest signal of this shift is Alberta's adoption of Talent Pipeline Management (TPM), a methodology that treats workforce development like supply chain management. Originally developed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation and proven across 30+ U.S. states, TPM flips the traditional model entirely.
Instead of training providers deciding what programs to offer and hoping employers hire graduates, TPM puts employers in the driver's seat. Sector-specific employer collaboratives collectively define the competencies and volumes of workers they need, then co-design training with education partners to fill those specific pipelines.
The province embedded TPM into its official Jobs Strategy, committed $2.4 million through 2028, and launched a TPM Academy training employers, educators, and government officials in the methodology.
Initial collaboratives are already operational. The Alberta Aerospace Fusion program, backed by $1.5 million, is building a direct employer-to-education pipeline for aviation technicians. Rather than aviation companies competing for whatever graduates colleges produce, they're collectively specifying what skills they need and partnering with training providers to deliver exactly that.
Alberta's TPM implementation would be interesting as a provincial experiment. What makes it significant is that it's already influencing national policy.
The federal government's Budget 2025 introduced Workforce Alliances, partnerships bringing together employers, industry associations, and unions to tackle sector-specific labour shortages. With $382.9 million over five years to launch these alliances, Ottawa is essentially building the same collaborative infrastructure TPM creates, using federal dollars.
The Atlantic provinces launched their own employer-led workforce development project explicitly using the TPM framework, funded by the federal Future Skills Program. The Canada West Foundation highlighted Alberta's TPM pilot as a model for competency-based hiring collectives. The Canadian Chamber of Commerce has advocated for scaling TPM nationally.
This matters because it represents a genuine policy shift, not just program expansion. When the federal government invests $382.9 million in Workforce Alliances rather than simply expanding existing training grants, it's making a structural bet: that lasting solutions come from giving employers agency in talent development, not just asking them to participate in consultations.
Many of the programs budgeted in 2025 will move from announcement to actual operation in 2026. Alberta's TPM Academy cohort will complete training and begin building employer collaboratives. The federal Workforce Alliances will onboard their first sector partnerships.
This creates a natural experiment. We'll see whether employer-led models can actually deliver at scale: faster hiring, better skill matches, reduced training-to-employment gaps, more diverse talent pools.
We'll also see the challenges. Coordinating employers who are normally competitors. Convincing education institutions to share design authority. Building data systems that can track competencies across fragmented training landscapes. Ensuring smaller employers can participate alongside large firms. Maintaining momentum when economic conditions shift.
For those of us working at the intersection of education, workforce development, and employment systems, three things warrant close attention in 2026:
Measurable Outcomes from Early Collaboratives: Alberta's aviation pipeline and similar sector-specific initiatives will provide the first real data on whether employer-led models reduce time-to-hire or improve retention compared to traditional programs. If the answer is yes, expect rapid scaling. If not, expect difficult conversations about whether collaboration overhead outweighs benefits.
How Federal Workforce Alliances Define Success: Ottawa's alliance funding comes with accountability expectations. The metrics they choose (placements, employer satisfaction, wage outcomes, diversity) will signal what "success" means for employer-led workforce development in Canada. Those metrics will shape how provinces and regions design their own initiatives.
Participation Beyond Large Employers: TPM and Workforce Alliances risk becoming vehicles for large employers with dedicated HR teams. Whether small and medium businesses can meaningfully participate, and whether the infrastructure serves their hiring needs, will determine if this approach scales economy-wide or remains concentrated.
The shift toward employer-led workforce development is part of a broader rethinking of how Canada connects learning to employment. The federal government is building a digital platform using AI to match job seekers with training and opportunities. Provinces are investing in micro-credentials and competency-based education. Foreign credential recognition is being accelerated. Skills-based hiring is gaining traction over degree requirements.
All of these moves point in the same direction: making talent development more responsive to actual labour market needs and making pathways more transparent to workers navigating them.
Whether that model delivers will become clear in 2026, as frameworks become operational and early results emerge. For practitioners, employers, and educators willing to do the hard work of genuine collaboration, often across legacy systems and competing interests, this moment represents a real opportunity to build infrastructure that might actually endure.
Looking ahead to 2026, we're committed to learning from those leading this work, sharing what's working across jurisdictions, and staying honest about what isn't.
.png)
While most workforce development coverage in 2025 focused on the billions committed in federal and provincial budgets, and the numbers are indeed historic, the more significant story is hiding in plain sight: Canada is fundamentally rewiring who leads workforce development.
For decades, the model was straightforward: governments fund training programs, education institutions design curricula based on their expertise, and employers hire from whoever graduates. When skills gaps appeared, the solution was more funding, more programs, more seats. Supply-side economics applied to talent.
That model is being quietly dismantled. In its place, a new approach is emerging, one where employers don't just consume talent, they co-design the pipelines that produce it.
The clearest signal of this shift is Alberta's adoption of Talent Pipeline Management (TPM), a methodology that treats workforce development like supply chain management. Originally developed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation and proven across 30+ U.S. states, TPM flips the traditional model entirely.
Instead of training providers deciding what programs to offer and hoping employers hire graduates, TPM puts employers in the driver's seat. Sector-specific employer collaboratives collectively define the competencies and volumes of workers they need, then co-design training with education partners to fill those specific pipelines.
The province embedded TPM into its official Jobs Strategy, committed $2.4 million through 2028, and launched a TPM Academy training employers, educators, and government officials in the methodology.
Initial collaboratives are already operational. The Alberta Aerospace Fusion program, backed by $1.5 million, is building a direct employer-to-education pipeline for aviation technicians. Rather than aviation companies competing for whatever graduates colleges produce, they're collectively specifying what skills they need and partnering with training providers to deliver exactly that.
Alberta's TPM implementation would be interesting as a provincial experiment. What makes it significant is that it's already influencing national policy.
The federal government's Budget 2025 introduced Workforce Alliances, partnerships bringing together employers, industry associations, and unions to tackle sector-specific labour shortages. With $382.9 million over five years to launch these alliances, Ottawa is essentially building the same collaborative infrastructure TPM creates, using federal dollars.
The Atlantic provinces launched their own employer-led workforce development project explicitly using the TPM framework, funded by the federal Future Skills Program. The Canada West Foundation highlighted Alberta's TPM pilot as a model for competency-based hiring collectives. The Canadian Chamber of Commerce has advocated for scaling TPM nationally.
This matters because it represents a genuine policy shift, not just program expansion. When the federal government invests $382.9 million in Workforce Alliances rather than simply expanding existing training grants, it's making a structural bet: that lasting solutions come from giving employers agency in talent development, not just asking them to participate in consultations.
Many of the programs budgeted in 2025 will move from announcement to actual operation in 2026. Alberta's TPM Academy cohort will complete training and begin building employer collaboratives. The federal Workforce Alliances will onboard their first sector partnerships.
This creates a natural experiment. We'll see whether employer-led models can actually deliver at scale: faster hiring, better skill matches, reduced training-to-employment gaps, more diverse talent pools.
We'll also see the challenges. Coordinating employers who are normally competitors. Convincing education institutions to share design authority. Building data systems that can track competencies across fragmented training landscapes. Ensuring smaller employers can participate alongside large firms. Maintaining momentum when economic conditions shift.
For those of us working at the intersection of education, workforce development, and employment systems, three things warrant close attention in 2026:
Measurable Outcomes from Early Collaboratives: Alberta's aviation pipeline and similar sector-specific initiatives will provide the first real data on whether employer-led models reduce time-to-hire or improve retention compared to traditional programs. If the answer is yes, expect rapid scaling. If not, expect difficult conversations about whether collaboration overhead outweighs benefits.
How Federal Workforce Alliances Define Success: Ottawa's alliance funding comes with accountability expectations. The metrics they choose (placements, employer satisfaction, wage outcomes, diversity) will signal what "success" means for employer-led workforce development in Canada. Those metrics will shape how provinces and regions design their own initiatives.
Participation Beyond Large Employers: TPM and Workforce Alliances risk becoming vehicles for large employers with dedicated HR teams. Whether small and medium businesses can meaningfully participate, and whether the infrastructure serves their hiring needs, will determine if this approach scales economy-wide or remains concentrated.
The shift toward employer-led workforce development is part of a broader rethinking of how Canada connects learning to employment. The federal government is building a digital platform using AI to match job seekers with training and opportunities. Provinces are investing in micro-credentials and competency-based education. Foreign credential recognition is being accelerated. Skills-based hiring is gaining traction over degree requirements.
All of these moves point in the same direction: making talent development more responsive to actual labour market needs and making pathways more transparent to workers navigating them.
Whether that model delivers will become clear in 2026, as frameworks become operational and early results emerge. For practitioners, employers, and educators willing to do the hard work of genuine collaboration, often across legacy systems and competing interests, this moment represents a real opportunity to build infrastructure that might actually endure.
Looking ahead to 2026, we're committed to learning from those leading this work, sharing what's working across jurisdictions, and staying honest about what isn't.
.png)
.avif)
